Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: cylinder head question
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #13
    FFR428's Avatar
    FFR428 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    fairfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Cougar S code, 427 Tunnelport.
    Posts
    942

    Well depending on the head casting there was not much difference between the GT and std FE heads. The GT exaust bolt pattern was different and maybe a slight chamber cc difference. Valves were std 2.02 In and 1.55 Ex. Now if you compare these to say the C8OE-N 428 CJ heads there is quite a differnece. Besides larger valves the CJ head exaust port is straighter, bigger volume and higher positioned relative to the head surface. These things combined helped exhaust velocity. The port opening measures almost the same but is postioned differently on the head and the internal passages are quite different. Now you might have been thinking of some of the FT heads. Those did have quite large chambers and smaller exhaust valves. Also the heat crossover is towards the center not offset like FE heads. The FT intake crossover was matched to these heads. These FT heads were common to the 330, 361 and 391. The 360, 390 truck engines were all given the FE style heads and intakes.


    G.
    Last edited by FFR428; 04-19-2006 at 05:11 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink