Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree28Likes

Thread: sluggish down low! help!
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    t.thompson259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    export
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 Trans am
    Posts
    9

    sluggish down low! help!

     



    Hey guys. So today I drove my car around my neighborhood today for the first time ever! I was super pumped! Brakes work great. Steering is tight! Little backround on it.

    It's a 75 trans am with a 4 bolt main Chevy 350. It's punched to a 355. 10.5:1 compression. Running on Sunoco 93 pump gas. It has cast iron 2.02 camel back heads. Ported and polished. Has a edelbrock victor Jr. Highrise intake with a carb spacer. It's feed by a Holley 750 double plumper mechanical choke. The choke is wired open. HEI distributor. The cam is unknown spec. But it only pulls 6-10 inchs of vacuum.

    Now the bad. It's just extremely sluggish down low. Below 3k I'd say. It breaks up a little also. The car starts fine! No hesitation. Also the idle jumps around a little. Between 900-1100. I'm not exactly sure where the timing is set. It's been a few months since I set it. I wanna say it's at 16 degrees. It did back fire once thru the carb. Should the power valve be replaced? I was wondering if this was a carb/fueling issue or if it's a timing issue or a combination of them. Any insite or things to try is greatly appreciated!

    Thanks in advanced guys! And when in doubt burn out!

  2. #2
    Rrumbler is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Car Year, Make, Model: Sans hot rod, sold the truck.
    Posts
    1,207

    I'm not a tech guru, just an old shadetree wrencher, but from what you have told us, I'd say too much cam, carb not tuned right, and timing way off. The real eggspurts may tune in here pretty soon. Need way more info to address this properly.
    Rrumbler, Aka: Hey you, "Old School", Hairy, and other unsavory monickers.

    Twistin' and bangin' on stuff for about sixty or so years; beat up and busted, but not entirely dead - yet.

  3. #3
    t.thompson259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    export
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 Trans am
    Posts
    9

    Thanks Rrumbler. I'm thinking its carb tuning seeing it was my first carb I ever did. Plus the powder valve might be blown. Also timing.

    For any other replies if you need more info just ask I'll give you as much info as I Gah! Thanks for the help!

  4. #4
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,037

    Any backfire/pop back through the carb points to too much initial timing. I'd back it down to about ten to twelve degrees of base timing and see what it does. And yes, if your Holley runs a power valve, and if you backfired it any then the power valve is likely toast, so get your timing set first, see if it feels any better and then replace the power valve and check plug color to see where your mixture's tracking across the range.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  5. #5
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    Holly has a kit to fix the blowing of the power valve. Depending on how old the carb is. The later ones won't need it. Not knowing what the cam is could cause you problems with timing.
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  6. #6
    shine's Avatar
    shine is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    bluff dale texas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 inderweed
    Posts
    2,117

    my guess is your power curve does not start until 3k + . high comp - big valves- big carb - daily driving it will be a dog most of the time and likely load up a lot .

  7. #7
    Mike P's Avatar
    Mike P is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SW Arizona
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 Ply, 68 Ply Valiant, 83 El Camino
    Posts
    3,785

    It definitely sounds like some basic tuning is on order to optimize the engine and the advice above is all good.

    After that is taken care of I suspect the car will still be a bit of a dog for the very reasons that shine wrote

    "......my guess is your power curve does not start until 3k + . high comp - big valves- big carb - daily driving it will be a dog most of the time and likely load up a lot ......."

    Add to that that that it is a fairly heavy car and the standard rear gear for the car (with automatic) was/is a 2.56, it will be no ball of fire from a dead stop.

    Personally I'd start saving for a deeper set of gears, possibly a looser convertor (depending on the cam) and an overdrive tranny if you plan of doing any highway driving.


    .
    Rrumbler and rspears like this.
    I've NEVER seen a car come from the factory that couldn't be improved.....

  8. #8
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I'm with the others, timing is probably off and check the power valve. A single plane intake like your Victor won't even start working till 3500 RPM... A dual plane intake and a 600 or650 vacuum secondary carb would move your power band down in the RPM range (probably some big lumpy sounding cam, too?) would make the car a whole lot more street friendly and better power. Bigger is not always better on cams and carbs!!!!!!
    Last edited by Dave Severson; 06-16-2014 at 02:51 PM. Reason: oops!!! Meant dual, wrote single!!!! Thanks Rog!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  9. #9
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,037

    I would lean towards a dual plane manifold over a single plane for the street, like something from the Edelbrock Performer line that's effective from idle up to 5500rpm or so - Intake Manifolds - Introduction - Edelbrock, LLC.
    rumrumm and glennsexton like this.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  10. #10
    shine's Avatar
    shine is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    bluff dale texas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 inderweed
    Posts
    2,117

    a 750 on a sbc is way too much for street use. you cant tune away cfm. drop to a 600 first then work from there.
    NTFDAY, Rrumbler and glennsexton like this.

  11. #11
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    If I can be blunt, it's not a carb/fueling/timing issue. It's a package issue. The carb, cam, timing, manifold, compression ratio, displacement, trans type, differential ratio have to complement each other. However, it's pretty hard to make any comment without knowing the rest of the package. What trans and rear axle ratio do you have? The cam specs are also an absolute must.

    I will venture this, though. The carb size and type are probably wrong for the engine, and the manifold is made for high rpm. Unless you have a manual trans, and a low rear gear, the double pumper is going to dump too much air/fuel mixture for the engine to run until it winds up. It appears you have a "package" that's always going to be soft on the low end unless you change some major components.
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

  12. #12
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,580

    Welcome to CHR!

    I have to concur with most of the above. If this vehicle is intended to see street use, you have too much carburetor, probably too much compression and in all likelihood too much cam. More information would be helpful for a diagnosis and as Jack mentioned – the entire package needs to function together.

    Do you have the casting numbers for the heads? Not trying to be negative, but not all camel humps were created equal. Did you assemble? How did you come up with 10.5:1? Are you certain they're 2.02 valves? Did you have the heads surfaced? What was the final volume of the combustion chambers? Was the block decked? If so, what was your final measurement (looking for a number somewhere between 9.025 and 9.000).

    If it were mine, I’d pull the heads and measure the deck clearance to determine if I could get the C/R down below 10:1 with a thicker head gasket. I’d then e-bay the Victor Jr and go with a Performer RPM and a 600CFM Edelbrock 1406 with the electric choke. You may need to lean down one size on the initial out-of-the-box jets and metering rods.

    Assuming the valves are correctly adjusted, the backfiring is probably caused by 16 degrees of initial timing – much too high as is attested to by the fire happening while your intake valve is still slightly open, but with the cam you have it may not idle much less than 12 degrees. Ideally, the initial timing should be 8-10 degrees and 34 degrees all in (around 2000-2200 RPM). If you cannot get to this point, the cam may be too big.

    6-10 inches of vacuum is unacceptable (in my opinion) for a street driven car. 20 inches of vacuum is a better number, 18 is about as low as I’d go on a street car with power brakes and below 18 is just scary for overall braking a 3800 pound car in a hurry.

    My two cents - keep us in the loop and once again, welcome to CHR!
    Glenn
    Rrumbler and rspears like this.
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

  13. #13
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by glennsexton View Post
    If it were mine, I’d pull the heads and measure the deck clearance to determine if I could get the C/R down below 10:1 with a thicker head gasket.
    Glenn, before learning differently, that may have been my suggestion as well. But reading through the Keith Black Piston catalog, I noted that John Erb, Chief Engineer for KB has stated that using a thicker head gasket to lower static compression ratio will increase the squish measurement and may allow the motor to detonate worse than it would have with the tighter squish, thinner gasket and higher static compression ratio.

    Piston crown configuration and combustion chamber volume are ways to change static compression ratio. Piston deck height and gasket thickness are ways to change squish.

    The fact is, this combination is not going to be street friendly because the OP has chosen the wrong parts.
    1. Static compression ratio is too high for iron heads. 9.5:1 max for today's fuels. 10.5:1 max for aluminum heads.
    2. Heads are steaming piles of dog poo. Much better heads are available for less money than re-furbishing these old relics.
    3. Wrong intake manifold. Use a single-plane if you need to make power over 6500. At low rpm's, there is too much volume in a single-plane intake to generate good vacuum to fill the cylinders. Use a dual-plane, high-rise such as the Edelbrock 7101 Performer RPM, Holley 300-36 or Weiand 8016 Stealth if you want to make good street power from idle to 6500. Holley and Weiand part numbers are out of production, but these manifolds can be found in good used condition on ebay, craigslist, racing junk, etc.
    4. Combination needs a 10", 3500 stall converter and a minimum 3.73 rear gear. More gear than that would be OK too, but 3.73 minimum. Use a vacuum-operated secondaries carburetor with a stock converter. Use a double-pumper with a looser aftermarket converter or manual trans.
    5. Not enough ignition timing. Disable centrifugal weights and lock timing out at 36 degrees at the crank. Install momentary push-button (normally closed) with 12-15 amp capacity. Cut the power wire to the coil and install the switch on the dash or some other easy-to-get-to place in the driver's compartment. When starting the motor, push the momentary-off switch with your left hand to interrupt power to the coil so that the motor will turn over easily with the starter switch that you are operating with your other hand. Once the motor has spun up, release both switches and she will be idling, no muss, no fuss.

    Use this tutorial to find true top dead center so that you can intelligently set the ignition timing with a light.......
    http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w...op_dead_center


    .
    Last edited by techinspector1; 06-17-2014 at 11:28 AM.
    glennsexton likes this.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  14. #14
    t.thompson259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    export
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 Trans am
    Posts
    9

    Thanks for the input all. Like I said I'm only 23 and learning this whole carb and timing thing when it isn't done by a computer. But I work graveyard and only get time to play on the weekends ill check some other stuff out this weekend. And get back to you guys! thanks a bunch!

  15. #15
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,580

    Quote Originally Posted by t.thompson259 View Post
    Thanks for the input all. Like I said I'm only 23 and learning this whole carb and timing thing when it isn't done by a computer. But I work graveyard and only get time to play on the weekends ill check some other stuff out this weekend. And get back to you guys! thanks a bunch!
    That's the attitude we really like to see here. We're all still learning - some are just a bit further down the road.

    As to your timing question, you could certainly try and set your initial timing at 8-10 degrees (vacuum advance disconnected and plugged) and see what difference it makes.
    Last edited by glennsexton; 06-18-2014 at 03:10 PM.
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink