Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Heading to the dyno
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    Heading to the dyno

     



    I am heading to the engine dyno room on Fri. for proper tune and numbers on my 496. After reading an article in PHR, I want to be sure I don't get inflated results. Not that I don't trust my builder/dyno man, any ideas on things to request or look for?
    Last edited by blueblazes; 05-03-2011 at 09:25 PM.

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by blueblazes View Post
    any ideas on things to request
    Go in with a revolver in your belt and tell 'em right up front that you want the truth.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    There is a 5 per cent variance between dynos--some give higher results, some more conservative results. But as long as the system is set properly, you should get pretty accurate numbers. The guy that ran the dyno on my engine told me that their system gave conservative results, and that magazines used systems that gave higher readings. He told me a customer purchased an engine from Hendrick for circle track racing, and their dyno results showed 35 less hp than the dyno at Hendrick. It's all relative.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  4. #4
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    Yeah kinda what I thought. Although the truck runs real good, I think his expectations are pretty high--700 hp. I am anxious the see the actual #s. Thanks for the reply and I hope our results are conservative.

  5. #5
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Doesn't really matter if it's a bit high or low, unless you're just looking for bragging rights, as long as the readings are consistently in error the same percentage. Hard to find a better tool for tuning then a dyno, though. Always figured 3 polls and tuning time on the dyno will yield better results then 3 weeks at the track!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  6. #6
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    I feel that the dyno is the only way to tune for me. There may be as few as 2 trucks or as many as 10 in the mud between our runs so the pit is never the same. No real acurate way to measure your times consistantly. And I agree that the numbers really don't matter....it's bringing home the $$ that really counts! Very few will ever see the tune results anyway.

  7. #7
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Quote Originally Posted by blueblazes View Post
    I feel that the dyno is the only way to tune for me. There may be as few as 2 trucks or as many as 10 in the mud between our runs so the pit is never the same. No real acurate way to measure your times consistantly. And I agree that the numbers really don't matter....it's bringing home the $$ that really counts! Very few will ever see the tune results anyway.
    X2 on that!


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  8. #8
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    Well got about the results that I expected today. Avg HP/567.4 & AVG TQ/574. Peak 655.8 hp@5900 & 632 tq@4800. He did say his #s were conservative so I am pleased with the results. Motor does need more air from 6500 rpms and up to make more power ( he thinks this is due to cam grind since rule require 16" vac@1000rpm) but I really don't want to turn it any harder than about 6800 anyway.

  9. #9
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Race teams in all kinds of racing can log results of any given race day,but I do get your point about mud racing and change track conditions.Btw-I worked at the Chevy engine plant in Tonn,NY yrs ago in the dyno rm.Race teams as you know use weather stations,track temps,as much data to try to decipher the how and why for any given run.What interests me is what you guys use for mud racing??.Do you guys use throttle stops,shudder boxes,etc.Honestly I don't know how mud racers handle their track tunes,but I am curious about it.
    Last edited by 1gary; 05-06-2011 at 10:19 PM.
    Good Bye

  10. #10
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i build more mud race engines then drag races engines ..guys i work with seem to go all out all the time.....they are nuts.... just rev limiters and a trans brake and Nos ..that s about it. they may re gear for shorter track for hill and hole class
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  11. #11
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    We run a stock class with the vac rule and as Pat says it's all go. We don't spray but leave the at 4500 for a 200' run. Our times are anywhere from 5.2 to 9 sec depending on pit conditions. We weigh 5400 lbs with the bbc and are not allowed to gut or cut. But 'glass bodies are allowed. Go figure....

  12. #12
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Those are pretty healthy numbers. Now, the proof is in the mud. Let us know how it performs.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  13. #13
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    Thanks and we run Fri. nite. I will post results when we get home. We have two 1st and one 2nd so far running on 7 cyl. and no 1st gear last month so hopefully will be strong. My 20 yr. old son/driver is excited and ready to try it out.

  14. #14
    blueblazes's Avatar
    blueblazes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    statesboro
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 k5 blazer
    Posts
    71

    Quote Originally Posted by rumrumm View Post
    Those are pretty healthy numbers. Now, the proof is in the mud. Let us know how it performs.
    Well the truck ran very good but the pit was dug to give the small trucks the advantage. Got only 25' before going down and got beat by an 85 hp 'Zuki Samari on 44s that stayed on and went around 180'. Maybe next time.

  15. #15
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Bummer, tell them you want some shallow mud, like one pass with a garden hose over some blacktop!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink