International Harvester small v 345.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqdYVwVrX1E
insanely :cool:
Printable View
International Harvester small v 345.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqdYVwVrX1E
insanely :cool:
WOW :whacked: :eek: :eek: !!!!!!....joe
It would be nice to know the torque/HP numbers. :)
A 345 IHC is a half a ton of iron, bigger dimensions than a BBC, and 180 HP at low RPM. Not your ideal hot rod power plant. Leave 'em for farm trucks.
UN holly combinders bat man:eek:would be nice to see some numbers on it . if it has a good block and money any thing can make big power some just cheaper and E Z Rrrrrrrrr then some:D
I'm betting that engine is mostly stock. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
i will take that bet :3dSMILE:Quote:
Originally Posted by 42K3
That's pretty slick. There is no substitute for "cubic money", and with a little or a lot of it, you can make almost anything work better. In my experience, those "Binder" motors were da*^% tough when they were tuned and maintained right, and some of you farm boys will probably agree. Used quite a few of them over the years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Pope
So is a 392 Hemi.
IHC never built cars.
:)
Hah! That's the first time I've heard a Binder and a Hemi called anything the same!
IHC never made a car, but a '61 Scout was smaller than many cars. the later Scouts had 345's and were nose heavy dogs. I've had a few of virtually every vehicle IH ever made, and none of them were any hot rods. Even put a 304 in a '61 scout! Had a few IHC's with Hemi's in 'em, too. Much better than 345's!
i knew a guy that had a bbc 427 in oneQuote:
Originally Posted by R Pope
.........................
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Pope
How about IH sv392 and Chrysler 392 Hemi ?
That 61 Scout was an American made mini-truck.
The Scout IIs are nose heavy, especially with a driving front axel.
so is a Dodge dart when you shoehorn in a 392 Hemi (see picture below)
the sv345 does weigh 150 lbs more than a SBC @ 575 lbs,
sv392 = 765 lbs,
392 Hemi = 767 lbs
:)
i did here that some did use the hemi in the old combinders how about a all alum donovan bbc 10.200 632cid only 450 pounds that will shuck your corn
you know hes got a poin stock 392's werent over 250 horse?????
I never get tired of this video. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by 42K3
Hi people,Quote:
Originally Posted by 42K3
The biggest lump of iron that I.H. ever made was a 547" back in the '50's
It made all others look small. The later 345" was also a hard worker.
I drove an 8 wheeler tray top with a g.v.w of 26 ton Imperial and
it had a 500 Holley on it. The reliabilty was 1st class and a credit
to Yank engineering... All the best from Skyeking......
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyeking
A 345/727 combo with Dana 44s can really hook up on a soft dirt hill in 4WD.
Greetings to you in NS. :cool:
It sounded to me, when he opened the carbs up all the way that it had one heck of a long flat spot before the RPM's started to come up. Watch the throttle's on the side of the carbs open, then listen too how long it takes it to raise the RPM's up.
Anyone else hearing the same thing.
Kurt
Kurt, that flat spot is from the dyno loading the engine up; it loads it and the engine has to overcome it to generate the hp and torque measurements. I agree with 42K3, though: this is always an entertaining video.