Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Chevy 292 straight six
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    1972chevy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Corona
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Chevy El Camino
    Posts
    30

    Chevy 292 straight six

     



    So I'm looking to buy a 292 that is stock bore but has 1.94 intake and 1.60 exhaust and a comp cams .488 lift with 212 duration and 113 lobe separation. My question is what kind of gas mileage would I get with a stock intake and exhaust and a t5 world 5 speed with a .67 over drive. I have a 1973 c10 daily driver with a 250 straight six that's getting weak and would like to go this route due to its a good price for the motor. Any help would be great.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    mopargary19355 is offline CHR Junior sMember Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Rice
    Posts
    2

    Do you know what gear ratio in the rear end? sounds like a good idling and torque maker and with o/d trans should see upwards of 20 mpg. but most all depends on axle ratio.

  3. #3
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor CHR Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,505

    Gotta love those straight six builds! Here’s some additional information you may find useful for the ½ ton models:
    Short bed has 117.5” WB and weighs 3,280 pounds
    Long bed has 131.5” WB and weighs 3,836
    Rear end rations were 3.43:1 and 3.73:1. The six cylinders most likely came with the 3.73:1. I’m assuming you have a three speed manual, which had a 3.50 low gear. If you have the truck 4-speed second gear ration is 3.58.

    The 250 CI motor produced 105 horsepower and 185 on the torque. The 292 (stock) is 120 horse and 215 ft/pounds of torque so you’ll notice an increase by default. The larger valves and cam selection should help this one breath a bit better and I’d be surprised if the head wasn’t shaved a whisker to square it up so you may have a bit more compression than stock.

    I have personal experience with a 1969 (similar size – probably less aerodynamic than the ’73) with the following modifications:
    Offy 4 barrel manifold like this one - http://www.summitracing.com/parts/of...Fe87MgodpgEAGA

    4 barrel Holley – 450cfm like this one - http://www.summitracing.com/parts/hl...48-1/overview/

    Split manifold headers like these - http://www.summitracing.com/parts/he...del/c10-pickup with a crossover pipe, 2-1/2” exhaust through Flowmaster 40 series all the way to the rear bumper.

    5 speed (Richmond? I think) with a 3.76 first and a 1:1 final to a 3.08:1 Positraction rear end with 33” overall diameter tires at 35-40psi.

    Few other things – aftermarket oil pan with windage tray to keep oil away from the crank, MSD electronics and an aftermarket (Mallory) pointless distributor, K&N 3” tall air cleaner.

    Around town (mostly empty – driver and ½- full tank of gas) 11-13 mpg. Maiden voyage from Portland to Seattle, about 400 miles of 55-60 mph freeway carrying two, 200+ pound people, yielded a surprising 21 mpg. Overall 12-16 seemed to be average. No difference whatsoever between regular and premium fuel - although I'd dump a few left over gallons of race gas (110+ octane) in her from time-to-time and I'm pretty sure I heard a sigh of satisfaction!)

    The 3.76 first with the 3.08 rear end does not produce neck-snapping acceleration, but it’s fine for drivability and pulling a light motorcycle trailer.

    Enjoy,
    Glenn
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink