Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 265 crank in a 283 block with 327 heads
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    TheFroFactor is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Niantic
    Posts
    13

    265 crank in a 283 block with 327 heads

     



    I was recently at a car show and someone told me that back in the 60’s and 70’s an old trick was to take a 283 block with a 265 crank the high performance 327 heads he said that it would run at around 10 thousand rpm and push out an easy 375-400hp when built right. This makes sense to me (apart from the 10,000rpm) He did say that these engines did not last long but you can also find a lot of 283’s and 327’s in junk yards so I am thinking of trying it. I was wondering if anyone has ever done this or heard of it being done.

  2. #2
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    you were wading in bull crap. a 265 and 283 use the same crank.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  3. #3
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    265 crank in na 283 is a 283.

  4. #4
    TheFroFactor is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Niantic
    Posts
    13

    What about a 327 or 350 block with a 283 crank? Or is the crank virtually the same in all small blocks.

  5. #5
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    That would be a 302.

  6. #6
    TheFroFactor is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Niantic
    Posts
    13

    302/400

     



    Is there any advantage to building it that way or is it virtually the same as a production 302 and on a separate not how about a 400 block or is the idea of a shorter stroke crank even worth doing or efficient at all.

  7. #7
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    a 302 is a 327 block with a 283 crank, Chevy built the 302 for trans Am racing, as the CID max was 305, and they only had the 283 at that time. The 302's were meant to wind up quick and sustain fairly high RPM's, they worked very well for what they were built for, but if you want a engine with a lot of power on the bottom end, you do not de stroke an engine, you stroke it.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  8. #8
    poncho62's Avatar
    poncho62 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Hanover, Ontario, Canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 51 Ford Pickup
    Posts
    416

    The 302s had much better heads, 4 bolt mains , solid cam, etc....................They were made to rev, not give bottom end torque

  9. #9
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    There were a lot of small inch SBCs used in the lower Modified Production and Gas classes in NHRA and IHRA competition. These were often 265s and 283s that were actually destroked to bring the displacement down. They were high winding, screaming banshees and 10k RPM was not out of the question. Many of them were using gears as low as 6.17-6.33 to get the heavy mass moving. The advent of the Doug Nash 5 speeds helped too and some were wheel standing monsters. A freind of mine's brother had an old Willy's sedan that they actually added weight to to make G/Gas. I used to sit at the top end of the track and listen to them come across the finish line. No other sound like it.

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink