Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By

Thread: Billetproof drags, found a Youtube
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Point taken. But, the springs, be they coilovers, leafs, or transverse should not be considered a chassis tuning item... They should only be correctly sized and rated to support the weight of the car. The tuning on coilovers comes in the shock valving and adjustments, the spring part of it just supports the weight. The items I would be concerned with are the bars or rod ends (or hairpins) snapping with the additional bite from slicks. Good shocks valved correctly will do more for traction with any kind of suspension. Nothing wrong with leaving the transverse spring, just make sure the parts that will have to withstand the torque transfer are up to the task!!!!

    Most altereds and diggers runs solid mounted rears. They work ok on a good track, but with decent power the cars tend to unhook and buzz the tires once you're off the sticky part of the track... Very few of the smaller tracks spray anything much further out the 60' to 100'...about the same place where you run out of rubber laid down on the track from the other cars. With less power then the rich kids run, a solid mounted rear works great, ran one myself for 3 years in Top Dragster and Quick 8.... Tire choice was critical for the car, softer compound worked better on tracks with less prep to them. If we were running some place that had a lot of big power cars then we could go to a harder compound, get good bite off the line and still keep the car hooked up from 300' to 600'.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  2. #2
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    What about drag radials, Dave? I keep seeing lots of them on PassTime on some pretty hairy cars. How do they compare to regular slicks?

    On our 68 Mustang I ran 11 inch M and H slicks and even with a 4 speed they hooked great. I think I would use those again for the old school look I like.

    Don

  3. #3
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by Itoldyouso View Post
    What about drag radials, Dave? I keep seeing lots of them on PassTime on some pretty hairy cars. How do they compare to regular slicks?

    On our 68 Mustang I ran 11 inch M and H slicks and even with a 4 speed they hooked great. I think I would use those again for the old school look I like.

    Don
    I set up a couple cars with the Hoosier Drag Radials, so I guess they're the only one's I can talk about... One car with them is a '63 Nova, healthy small block and a Heidts IFS under the front.... He's running the 245's and really hooks hard on the car with 15 psi and a 2800 rpm launch with a 700R4 trans and 4.11's. The other one was an '83 Mustang with 5.0 and 5 speed. same width tire, good lower bars and held the same 60' times with the drag radials as with slicks!!!!! The car is tubbed, he was running a huge 15" wide slick and went to the 245 radial---actually goes a full tenth of a second faster on the drag radials because of the HUGE decrease in rolling resistance. I have the Hoosier's on my Mustang...they even do ok uptown on a Saturday night!! Best part about the drag radials, they don't "unload" like a slick does and give the big bouncy ride on the big end......

    PS--Just pulled the invoice, we put 245 x 45 x 17's on the Mustang....another + with the drag radials is the 17" tire of course has less sidewall height and more stability going thru the quarter.....
    Last edited by Dave Severson; 11-06-2011 at 04:44 PM. Reason: left out the tenth's!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  4. #4
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    Those radials sound like a good move. I remember the M and H's on the Mustang hooked best at about 11-13 psi air pressure, and at the big end I could feel it moving side to side as I went across the finish line.

    Don

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink