Results 1 to 15 of 31
Threaded View
-
12-11-2004 04:24 PM #9
Well not quite that bad, you did'nt say what year camaro but heres a few to compare,Originally posted by billlsbird
Thank You Viking, So we're looking at around 2600. Ah hah, yeah, the aerodynamic thing! I forgot ALL about that . I guess having the '32 would be like bolting a 4 x 8 sheet of plywood on the front of my Camaro??? Not a good thing ;( Ok, now a Monica??? I hate to sound stupid or even ignorant for that matter, but is a Monica a supercharger??? If so, I asked some questions a while back on adding a GMC to this motor but was told not to. May be cuz the motor is bored .060 over??? Thin walls??? Bill.....
Year...........Body............Front Area...........Drag Coef
34..........Roadster.............18.0.....................0.42
69...........Camaro...............22.0....................0.36.
77...........Camaro...............18.0....................0.35
01.....Typical Pro Stock.......18.0....................0.34
With the 4 core Radiator and the 8-71 monica underdriven you should be cool in a couple of ways.
Last edited by viking; 12-11-2004 at 04:27 PM.
Objects in the mirror are losing





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
I bought the 76 in August , but haven't been able to work on it. When I get a chance I'll post some pictures.
Corvette Resurrection?