I just bought a 283 project engine.
Somebody said it's from 60's Corvette.
Maybe? (Look the picture!)
The block number is:
GM 384 9852
Cylinder head number is:
388 4520
Is there a good web page where I could get more info about the engine?
Jani
Printable View
I just bought a 283 project engine.
Somebody said it's from 60's Corvette.
Maybe? (Look the picture!)
The block number is:
GM 384 9852
Cylinder head number is:
388 4520
Is there a good web page where I could get more info about the engine?
Jani
Hi Jani.
Try www.mortec.com they have a lot of information on chevy engine IDs
AL
There should be a number stamped on the pad on the front side passengers side of the block deck (it would be just foward of where the cyl head would end. If you can provide that number, I may be able to decifer what the engines original application is. I'll see if I can find the block casting number when I go out to the shop, but all that will give me is displacement and year.
Jani.
Early Corvette engines were painted blue instead of Chevy orange. Your block doesn't have any traces of orange paint so it might be from a Corvette. I don't know if the Vette engine had bigger valves or a different cam or if it was the same as a regular car engine. I thuoght they all came with the aluminum valve covers that said Corvette on them. Maybe Mike P knows more about that than I do.
AL
So far, with the info I have (i.e. casting numbers and what I can tell from the pictures) it is a 283 with "power pack" heads. To tell any more I need the number stamped on the deck (these should break back to the application, HP, trans type etc). Hopefully the block has not been decked, as the milling process will have taken off the numbers.
MikeP wrote:
Hopefully rhe block has not been decked, as the millimg prosses will take off the numbers.
:) Hi
That's good advice Mike! Thank's! I had a 010 block that has factory nodular 4 bolt main caps. Needless not say, I had it bored and the machinist took .010 off the deck. Dummie me didn't write down the numders that are on the front passender side of the block, dang-me. I do know it was cast in 69. I aslo have a 4 bolt 454 block that I bought from my machinist. Same story, he decked it before I ever saw it, bummer.
Also *Salute* too the Al Show
Mortec is a great site, the links are good also! I've used Mortec for a few years now and find it's info valuable.
Respectfully
Monte
Hey Monte,
A few drops of sulfuric acid where the numbers were milled off should make the numbers readable. The metal was compressed and deformed by the stamp and the acid should show what was there. The cops used this method to identify stolen cars that had the numbers changed. I never tried it myself though I saw it on a tv show.
AL
Because of the time zones, i'm in the future and I have to wait for your reply to the next day every time.
I will try to check the stamped number from the block Mike!
Thanks for the web link Al.
Information so far:
The block is 283 c.i.d, 1957-66
The casting date is A286 (28.Jan.19?6)
The heads are 283 or 327c.i.d, 1960-67
The color of the engine is blue and it has a short water pump and a long oil pan.
Does this all mean that the engine is a:
283 V8 from a 1966 Corvette?
Jani
At this point it is not really possible to say. There is a possibility it is, but as I said it's the stamped number/letters that will tell. (If the engine has ever been rebuilt, chances are that it was chemically cleaned and repainted.)
Jani,
Couple things I can add based on picture and comments.
Block would be '58 or later based on motor mount flanges.
I don't think the color is meaningful for a 283 or 327, the early blue Vettes were the sixes, by '58 they were the signature "orange". In the '70's the "corporate" 350's were also blue.
Based on the casting mark, heads should have a casting number ending in 520 or 896. They'd be for '58 & up 283 power paks, '58-60 Vette, originally were 9.25-1 comp ratio, 1.72/1.50 valves, 59cc chambers.
Wouldn't be from a '66 Vette unless it's a 327. With the introduction of the 327 in '62, 283's weren't available in Vettes.
Those valve covers weren't available on the 327, but then, we don't know how stock it is either.
Mike,
Ok, I found the number from the block and it is: F03I5WA
The numbers where very clear and readable.
Bob,
You say yhat they didn't use 283's in Vette after '62???
Jani
Jani,
Actually, 1961 was the last year of 283 in the Vette. From '62 to early '65 only 327, then 396 was added in '65.
Based on the number you posted, the engine is F= Flint plant, 03=March, 15=15th day, WA=283. My source indicates the WA is 1965, but since it didn't have any later date decode that could mean WA was used 1965 thru 1967.
Bob,
What about the casting date on the other end of the block. It is A286 (28.Jan.19?6)???
I thought it was a Vette engine because of the long oil pan and the short water pump.
Maybe the block has been in a Corvette to replace a broken original block?
Does the small collar inside the end of the camshaft mean that it has been connected to a manual transmission?
If the block is bored to .010 oversize what is the c.i.d then?
What does the power pack mean? (Cylinder head number is: 3884520)
Jani
Jani,
Casting date would, and should, precede production date. In other words, the block could be cast in January of '66, then machined and engine assembled in March, two months later. Probably means you have a '66 engine.
Could be this engine came from a truck which had the larger pan too, or someone added the larger pan for some reason.
As for "collar", you said cam shaft, but probably meant crank shaft. I can't tell well enough as the picture shows on my screen, but I see you have it circled. If there is a "collar" inserted, that would be the pilot bushing/bearing for the manual transmission input shaft.
.010 is what we call a clean up bore. Adds just over 1 cubic inch. In another thread, Mike had mentioned a .125 overbore (1/8 inch) to get a 283 up to 301 cubic inches. That would be 18 cubic inches. .010 is about 1/12th of .125, 1/12th of 18 = 1.5".
Power pack was Chevrolet's designation for engines equipped with 4 barrel carb and dual exhaust.
Bob your doing better than me in breaking it back, WA doesn't show up in my references. (Sorry Jani).
Just to add a little to what Bob said, the little triangle you circled on the head is usually the easy way to tell if the heads are "power pack" or not).
Chevrolet used the short water pumps on the magority if not all their cars through 1968. The Vettes and the trucks used the short pumps longer.
Jani, keep in mind there is nothing magic about a Corvette motor. Yes they did use the better heavy duty factory parts, but these could be purchased over the counter at any Chevy dealer, and with few exceptions (the tri-power 427 comes to mind) the engines themselves could be special ordered in almost any other body style. With the parts available these days, it would be fairly simple to build the 283 you have to meet or exceed the original Corvette HP numbers. All that is really needed is to match the Compression ratio, cam size and profile, valve size and carburation.
We used to have a joke around the shop that "Every Small Block Chevy had been a Vette motor and every Early Hemi was a 392" due to the number of people who made that claim about their engines (especially if they were trying to sell them).
Bob and Mike!
So the engine is probably a 1966 283 c.i.d power pack truck engine?
Why I want to know it so baddly is because I want to rebuild the engine to my '34 Fordor and we have so strickt rules here in Finland on how much bigger engine can replace the factory engine. 283 is ok for 34 Ford!
Do you guys have suggestion on what should I do for the engine just to get it running great with maybe some extra hp. (I know, just painting it isn't enouf!)
What camshaft do you prefer for it?
Or should I buy the original Camshaft.
I don't know so much about calculations
Jani
Just a few quick questions (part of what I said in an earlier post):
1. How do you plan on driving the car? Do you want a nice crusier,(i.e. around town, and occasional longer trips) or a street monster to terrorize the town and blast down the highway?
2. How important is gas milage?
3. How good is the local gas (octane rating), and is it leaded or unleaded?
4. Approximatly how heavy will the car be?
5. What type of transmission do you plan on running?
6. What ratio rear end are you planning on using and how tall of tire?
1) Nice cruiser and reliable. On summers I would like to visit to the Street Rod Nationals around the Europe.
2) Very important! 1 Liter Gas cost here about 1 Euro (=about 3,8$/gallon?)
But hey, you cannot build a Street Rod without a V8
3) 95 octane unleaded (Yes, maybe I need the rims between the heads and valves!)
4)I don't know? (1934 Ford Fordor Sedan)
5) TH700-R4 from '89 Pontiac GTA
6) The chassis is almost ready and the parts are mainly from '89 Camaro:
- Rear end with drum brakes and coil overs, no differential lock(haven't measured the ratio)
- Front, dropped 34 Ford I-beam, with disk brakes and 4-links.
I also have a 305 TPI engine from '86 Camaro with Edelbrock MPFI but that's another story.
I just want to build a reliable 283 small block.
janiluo,
I think that the '34 Fordor would have weighed about 2,600 lbs in its original configuration.
By the way, I had good luck with a 283 in a '56 Chevy back in the early 1970's using over the counter Corvette pistons, generic headers, a good dual point ignition, aluminum intake with a 500 cfm carb. The car ran smooth and dependable, and would push the 3,500 lb car pretty good.
Dan J
This is how I would build it, but other people may have differnt sugestions, so weigh what you think will work best for you.
1. Start with a good general rebuild. Bore the block only as large as necessary to clean up the clyinders, and deck the block only if necessary. Try to get pistons that will give you a compression ratio in the 9.5 to 1 area (if some of the places you go do not offer 95 Octane gas, consider going to 9 to 1 compression ratio.) When you order pistons make sure you take into account the head combustion chamber volume to make sure you end up with the required compression ratio. Cast pistons should be fine, and hypereutectic would be a good upgrade. Forged pistons would not really be required for this motor. The majority of the 283s I have come across have had steel crankshafts, have yours checked and turned as necessary. (If you have a cast crankshaft, don't worry, it will be more than strong enough for your application). Have the rods checked and resized as necessary. A new set of rod bolts is not a bad investment, but I don't think you necessarly need to spend the extra money for the ARP high stregnth bolts. It would also be a good idea to have the rotating assembly balanced. Put in new cam bearings and freeze plugs and put in a high volume oil pump.
2. On the heads, have hardened exhaust seats put in, you will also likely need new valve guides. Have a good valve job done and install a new set of valve springs. I have good luck with umbrella valve seals, but a lot of people like PC seals. Deck the heads only as much as necessary (keep in mind if the heads and/or block are decked this will increase your compression ratio). You might want to do a little port matching on the intake and exhaust runners, but don't go overboard. I'm assuming that your heads have 1.72/1.50 valves, You might want to look around and upgrade these to later 1.94/1.50 heads. (If you change heads keep in mind the combustion chamber size, as it will affect your compression ratio.) If you use post 1969 heads you will also get the accessory bolt holes in the ends which means you can use the latter more common brackets.
3. I would use a cam that is in the .400-.420 lift, 260-280 degree duration area. (I personally prefer a cam with split lift/duration, i.e. a little higher lift and duration on the exhaust side). I have also found that they seem to run a little better with about 4 degrees advance (check with the cam maker as many grind the 4 degrees into the cam). A double roller timing chain is also a good investment for the price.
4. As far as exhaust I read some tests years ago, and the rams horn manifolds flowed as well as headers until about 4000 rpm. Headers would still not be a bad idea, but I would keep the primary tube size at 1 1/2" and no bigger than 1 5/8" max. If you can find tri-Y headers even better.
5. It's wide open as far as induction. A good aftermarket dual plane intake and 4 BBL in the 500-600 CFM range is about the cheapest most common way to go. For nostalgia, a Dual quad (with 500 CFM AFBs) or Tri Power Set up looks really neat and can be dialed in to get pretty decent milage (if you go this route, make sure the manifold is a dual plane design). If cost is not an object, you might look into somthing like Holleys Pro-Jection set up. I've never used one, but I understand from a preformance/power standpoint they are a good way to go.
6. For realibility and availability, an old GM HEI is really a good ignition setup (unfortunatly, they will not fit with most multicarb set ups.)
7. The 700-R4 is a good choice for the tranny, and I would recommend somthing in the 3.00-3.25 range if it's going to see a lot of highway miles and around a 3.50 ratio if it's going to spend most of it's time around town.
Hope this helps, and I suspect your will be getting more sugestions.
Thank's Mike!
You really understood what I'm looking for. I dont have so much experience about compression ratios or cam lifts and degrees.
I usyally mix up the words Cam and Crankshaft because of the Finnish translation the crankshaft is 'Kampiakseli' where 'Kampi" means a Cam and 'Akseli' means a shaft (Sorry Bob!)
Now I know what to ask!
One thing more, I've heard that it is not good to use a high volume oil pump in the just rebuild engine!
Does anybody have opinion about that?
Thanks,
Jani
I've never had any problems with the high volume pumps, however I have had some problems running High Pressure pumps. One of the bad reps the High Volume pumps have had comes from an engine not having sufficient drainback capability at high RPM, in other words all the oil is pumped to the top of the engine and can't drain back fast enough to keep the level above the oil pickup. This should not be a problem with the RPM range and usage you are planning for your car.
According to the book I have the 282 only came in '62 and earlier models of the Corvette.
Quote:
Originally posted by Ingham
According to the book I have the 282 only came in '62 and earlier models of the Corvette.
:) 61 and earlier . 62 models only came with 327s
250--300--340--360 horsepower
The last year for a 283 was 67. It was replaced by the 307 in 68
:)