Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Have heads (kind of) now what?
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 21

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Smac61 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Warren
    Car Year, Make, Model: 84 Buick Regal
    Posts
    9

    Re: Re: Have heads (kind of) now what?

     



    I'm a little confused.

    Dart claims the 200's are "ideal for 383-400 where excellent torque is desired without loosing the ability to wind it out occationally" The 1.437 double springs are 130#@1.800"/.620 max (Comp cams 987) They also have 1.250 single and 1.55 double available. If the 1.437's are wimpy why do they even offer 1.250's?

    I really apprieciate all the input Im getting on this as I'm just learning.

    Thanks again,
    Sean

    Originally posted by erik erikson
    TO MUCH HEAD FOR 80 % OF STREET ENGINES.A LARGER CUBIC INCH ENGINE WOULD BE MORE FORGIVING.THESE SMALL SPRINGS WON'T LET YOU PUT MUCH CAM TO IT.YOU WOULD HAVE TO RUN A LOT OF GEAR AND A LOT OF STALL TO MAKE THEM WORK RIGHT OTHERWISE IT WILL FEEL LIKE YOU DON'T HAVE MUCH THROTTLE SIGNAL.
    Last edited by Smac61; 11-13-2005 at 09:45 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink