Choose A Cam By Head Flow Rates.
If we know the given flow rates for a set of heads.How do we pick a cam then?I understand the exhaust port flowing say 75% or 80% of the intake port is great but what if we want to run N20. or a blower.If the exhaust does not flow where we want it to then can we try and hold the exhaust valve open a few more degree's at .050 to compensate for this .I guess my question is how much longer can a person hold the valve open without blowing it all out the exhaust side.Is there a formula out there to determin this.I do know some of the cam makers ask for the flow rates in picking out the cam.Yes I know dyno time would tell me this. But how do the cam makers make their guess ?
Re: yes, smaller is better
Quote:
Originally posted by shevy not heme
Those of you that have installed a hot cam and THEN found that your car has turned into an unmanagable mongrel raise your hands...:CRY: Fact is that the cams and other performance goodies are big money makers and so they don't tell unsuspecting kids that the parts are only worth a nickel if you are doing 3000rpm and higher. And that simply isn't practical unless it is a race car. Cam selection involves dozens of varibles of which about 70% or more of street rods don't come close to being a good matching combination. Sometimes, operating range (RPM) should be what we make our selection of parts around. Just ask the auto-makers about that. And I've made alot of these mistakes of building em bakards.:3dSMILE:
Yep, so have I. That's why in a recent post I stated that the cam is the final item that should be purchased for a motor. Younguns don't understand that the cam should be used to compliment the build. They think that the wilder the grind, the faster their car will be.
I recall back to the days when my youngest son was in high school auto shop. I used to go up when I had the time and help Mr. Painter (shop teacher). I'd take a dozen or so of the youngsters into an adjacent room and field their questions about motors. They used to call me "Mr. No-cam". I remember one youngster in particular who had a '69 Chevelle 350/350 with a 2.73 open rear and stock converter. He had chosen a cam with over 300 degrees duration (advertised) and couldn't understand why the car wouldn't pull the hat off his head. :LOL: