Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: virgin 454 build guestion
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    virgin 454 build guestion

     



    I was given another 454 that hasn't been touched and decided to just work with more or less bolt-on's for now. As this being my first engine build I have some idea whats going on but not everything. I know all the parts have to work together or it's more or less junk. I looked into a top end kit from edelbrock and it says 1500-6000rpm but a friend of mine said that It would be better to go idol to 5000 as I would be putting too much stress on the motor at 5500-6000. I like the sound of a loping motor and know its in the cam but I have no idea what im looking at when it comes to cam numbers so i need some advise there. does anyone know of a bolt on kit for the 454 that would give the sound im looking for? the camaro has 3" flowmaster 40 series all the way back so the noise would be there but im looking for the lope. thanks

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    The tighter the lobe separation angle, the rattier the cam sounds. 106, 104, 102, pick one. Manifold vacuum will be in the toilet, so make some other provision for vacuum operated accessories such as power brakes. Lunati grinds a Voodoo profile and Comp grinds a Thumpr and Mutha Thumpr that will make the sound you are looking for. You'll need to modify your ignition timing curves, putting in more at the crank and limiting the total advance curve at the weights and stops.

  3. #3
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    sounds good, I'm not looking for a serious lope but just enough to turn heads with out having to figure out the brake issue you described. I'm sure there will probably be some there but as I would have no idea where to start with that issue I'll leave it alone until i have a bit more knowledge on just what I'm doing. As far as separation all I have found through top-end kits was edelbrock at I believe 112 or 114. but if there would be no noticeable sound difference then I assume I would have to go to a tighter separation until I get where I want to be with out braking issues. Now, as far as timing, I understand advancing and retarding the timing is this the same as "putting it more at the crank" or am I not even on the same page? sorry for the probably redundant questions but I have paid too much over the years having motors built and put in and no time working on them myself.

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by bear9820 View Post
    sounds good, I'm not looking for a serious lope but just enough to turn heads with out having to figure out the brake issue you described. I'm sure there will probably be some there but as I would have no idea where to start with that issue I'll leave it alone until i have a bit more knowledge on just what I'm doing. As far as separation all I have found through top-end kits was edelbrock at I believe 112 or 114. but if there would be no noticeable sound difference then I assume I would have to go to a tighter separation until I get where I want to be with out braking issues. Now, as far as timing, I understand advancing and retarding the timing is this the same as "putting it more at the crank" or am I not even on the same page? sorry for the probably redundant questions but I have paid too much over the years having motors built and put in and no time working on them myself.
    Yeah, the more cam you use, the more initial ignition timing at the crank the motor wants. If you increase the timing at the crank, you need to decrease the centrifugal timing in the distributor to keep the total initial plus centrifugal about the same.

    I'm gonna talk about small block Chevies here because I am more familiar with them. Some of the other fellows on this board are more familiar with big blocks and hopefully they will chime in on this thread to customize it for your needs. Irregardless, every motor out there is just a big old air pump and they all respond pretty much the same way to modifications by us Troglodytes.

    If, for instance, you are using L31 Chevy heads or other current technology cylinder heads that have a very efficient chamber, the motor will probably run best with about 34 degrees total initial plus centrifugal ignition timing under power. The stock distributor arrangement probably provides around 24 degrees centrifugal advance, so if you use more advance at the crank without changing your centrifugal curve in the distributor, you will likely have too much total initial plus centrifugal timing in the motor. The older design, less efficient heads with less efficient chambers may want a little more total ignition advance, up around 36 or maybe a little more. I know some fellows have told me they are running 40 with the older heads.

    OEM timing curves call for the total initial and centrifugal to be all in by somewhere around 3600 rpm's or maybe a little higher. This will work swell for haulin' Grandma to Bingo, but is less than ideal for our modified ground pounder. Most fellows will agree that total initial and centrifugal should be in the mix by 2600 to 3000 rpm's.

    Here's a general recommendation for initial timing at the crank for different camshafts and carbs.
    Less than 220 @ 0.050" camshaft- 10-12 degrees ignition advance at the crank with enough centrifugal to make 34 at 2800. (assuming efficient chambers).
    Less than 240 @ 0.050" camshaft- 14-16 degrees ignition advance at the crank with enough centrifugal to make 34 at 2800. (assuming efficient chambers).
    Less than 240 @ 0.050" camshaft with big carburetor- 16-20 degrees ignition advance at the crank with enough centrifugal to make 34 at 2800 (assuming efficient chambers).
    Less than 260 degrees @ 0.050" camshaft- 20-24 degrees ignition advance at the crank with enough centrifugal to make 34 at 2800 (assuming efficient chambers).
    More than 260 degrees @ 0.050" camshaft- 24 plus degrees ignition advance at the crank. At this point, you may consider locking out the centrifugal and running initial advance at the crank only (34 at the crank, zero centrifugal, assuming efficient chambers).

    These suggestions are only to get you in the ballpark. Each and every motor is unique and different unto itself, so tinker with carburetor and ignition timing adjustments until you get your particular combination dialed in. There are numerous kits available from Summit and others that will allow you to tailor the centrifugal ignition advance in your distributor.

    Many of you fellows and gals are using the popular Edelbrock Performer carburetor, so I'll include the Owner's Manual here for you to dial in the carb....REMEMBER, these carbs do not like more than 5 psi fuel pressure at the carb inlet. More pressure than that will over-power the needle and seat and blow raw fuel into the intake manifold, providing you with a tuning nightmare that you may never find unless you know about the limit on fuel pressure. If you don't know what the pressure is on your combo, then rig up a mechanical fuel pressure gauge and mount it temporarily on the cowl of the vehicle so you can monitor it through the windshield while you drive. That's the only way you will know. Use duct tape or tie wraps to secure the 0-15 gauge to the cowl. It's only temporary.
    http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...ers_manual.pdf

    Somewhere along the way as you are increasing the initial ignition timing, you will encounter resistance against the starter. You can fix this by installing a momentary push button on the steering wheel or on the dash where you can get to it easily. The button should be installed so as to interrupt the power supply to the coil. Push the button, crank the motor up to speed with the starter key, then release the button. The motor will fire normally without the drag on the starter that would result from trying to turn the motor against so much initial ignition timing at the crank.

    As far as the power brake issue, most guys will not talk about it. I think it must be human nature not to admit that you screwed up something. Power brakes will need a minimum of 18 inches of mercury (in hg) to operate correctly and efficiently. Suppliers and others will tell you that they will operate fine at 14 inches or 12 inches. BULL HOCKEY. They were designed by the engineers at the factory to work with stock cams that produce 20-22 inches of mercury. Hopefully you can see past the crap and realize that as you pull back on the suck, you pull back on the efficiency of the power brake booster. It's just that frickin' simple. No amount of BULL HOCKEY will make it any different.

    If you find yourself with enough cam to negate the correct operation of power brakes, there is only one real fix. Add an electrically-operated vacuum pump to the system. Those Fosdick vacuum cans will hold enough vacuum for one good stop, then they are done until you run the motor to fill the can again (or un-fill the can, depending on how you look at it).
    http://www.summitracing.com/search/S...p&autoview=SKU

    You may encounter some pinging (detonation) with the increased ignition timing. Do not let this continue for even a micro-second. This is the sound of the motor coming apart from the inside out. Detonation can crack piston rings, break pistons in half, bend connecting rods and even break crankshafts. This problem can usually be side-stepped by building the motor with a very tight squish (0.035" to 0.045") and using the correct grade of fuel. Of course, you must match the camshaft timing to the static compression ratio of the motor in the first place or you are fighting a losing battle.

    Once you get the initial and centrifugal dialed in, it is time to work on the vacuum advance. OEM systems will usually add about 10-12 degrees of vacuum advance to the system as the manifold vacuum comes up due to cruising or other light loads on the motor. There are 2 things to consider here. One is the total AMOUNT of advance applied to the system. The other is the RATE at which the advance is applied to the system. You can, of course, keep the OEM system and hope for the best, or you can purchase a Crane adjustable cannister and stop limiter plate and dial the vacuum advance in to where the motor wants it for best operation.
    Crane number 99601-1 will modify a Delco point type distributor. Crane number 99600-1 will modify an HEI distributor. The limiter plate for each of these is Crane number 99619-1.
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CRN-99601-1/
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CRN-99600-1/
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CRN-99619-1/

    One other point to make. Most fellows will run the vacuum cannister off manifold vacuum. Some fellows will run it off ported vacuum. You will have to try both positions to see which works best for your application. Ported vacuum was originally introduced for the early emissions systems cars and can be found above the throttle blades on the carb. Manifold vacuum is taken from below the throttle blades or directly from a nipple screwed into an intake manifold runner.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 10-30-2010 at 04:31 PM.

  5. #5
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    thanks for the layout on that, I'll have to print that off and keep it for notes. I tried to download a dyno sim but knowing nothing of the numbers I found myself on google alot but it's slowly seeping in. The preverbal light hasn't snapped on yet but I'm gettin there and have almost figured out the air flow and messed with the idea of different odds and ends so heres where I'm at, the edelbrock top end kit #2095 but swapping the cam for Comp cams K11-772-8 complete street mechanical roller cam kit. and gutting the heads more or less for com cams aluminum 1.7 roller rocker arm, Milodon 2.19x 1.88 valves adding a better set of push rods changing to KB 257 (26 cc dome) piston and a 10" converter. as for ignition I found that MSD makes a street fire HEI ignition and I would like to swap for a full MSD ignition so I may go that route and see what I come up with. I don't want to be the guy that burns through a ton of cash to find out I went the wrong way to begin with. It would help if I stayed awake in shop class I guess. I hope the set up is the right direction as I put most of the day into looking up parts and trying to figure out this junk dyno sim I somehow found through google.

  6. #6
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    here's what I'm working with
    Attached Images
    Last edited by bear9820; 10-31-2010 at 07:06 PM.

  7. #7
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    yep very small o ports with rotators on intake and ex side of the heads low rpm hi tq head
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  8. #8
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    Yeah, I figured they were junk so I'm looking into the edelbrock top end kit to try and fix that issue before I get too far ahead of myself. I think I found a good set but couldn't figure out the dyno sim I downloaded so I sent the specs to techinspector and hoping the combo I put together will come back with something decent.

  9. #9
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i know a guy that has built manyBBC . i bet he tell you your not going to get much cam in it or any cr to make any power. so the top end kit could be a wast of $$ less you do some thing with you piston s good luck
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  10. #10
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    KB pistons, and a comp cam insted of the stock pistons and edelbrock cam

  11. #11
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    Comp cam 279TH7 or Comp Cam 11-772-8 not sure, KB 257 (26 cc dome) piston, comp cam aluminum 1.7 roller rocker arm, Edelbrock performer rpm heads, Performer RPM manifold, milodon 2.19x 1.88 valves, higher quality push rods, and JEGS Street/Strip XHD 10'' Torque Converter. just a start and I'm sure I'm missing something but thats at least the start of the list so, no, I'm not going to run the stock heads or pistons.

  12. #12
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I won't run any more DynoSims with a flat tappet cam. Here's a combination of parts for a street/strip motor....
    454 bored +0.030". Align hone the main bearing bores. Deck the block at 9.790", registering off the main bearing bore. With the pistons you will be using and a 0.039" head gasket, the squish will be 0.049".
    Keith Black #KB257 pistons (pay attention to top ring gap and piston to wall clearance recommendations from the manufacturer).
    CompCams 11-450-8 retrofit hydraulic roller cam. Rough idle. Use 2500+ converter.
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-CL11-450-8/
    RHS #11301-02 cast iron heads. Take 'em out of the box and bolt 'em on.
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/RHS-11301-02/
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FPP-1037/
    10.2:1 static compression ratio with the KB pistons
    Weiand Stealth intake mounting an 850 carb
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/WND-8018/
    Long tube headers
    RPM HP TQ
    1500 110 385
    2000 173 453
    2500 219 460
    3000 283 495
    3500 362 543
    4000 437 574
    4500 502 590
    5000 549 577
    5500 570 545
    6000 575 502
    6500 526 425
    Peak volumetric efficiency 101.5% @5000
    Peak BMEP 191.8 @4500
    There are many ways to build a BBC. This is one that I like because the heads work well and don't cost an arm and a leg. You do need to bite the bullet on the roller cam though and be done with it.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 11-01-2010 at 03:46 PM.

  13. #13
    bear9820's Avatar
    bear9820 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    independence
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 camaro
    Posts
    8

    Looks like a good starting point for this winter, next winter ill have to figure something else out. Thanks again for your time.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink