Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Rect. vs. Oval
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    wrenchaholic's Avatar
    wrenchaholic is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    92

    I guess I don't actually KNOW the rect's are too big, but based on all I've read and the recommandations given for mild/street engine builds, they are always opted out for the oval ports. I guess you get better cylinder fill at lower rpm's because of the smaller intake ports while not loosing any breathability. My initial guess was I would gain a little compression and better cylinder fill, and as Nitro said, this would put my power down into a more usable rpm range. I just didn't know if it was worth it...financially.
    I'd rather be driven, then taken for a ride.

  2. #2
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    Or, if you blend the square port to enter in the right spot as the flow enters the head port, square ports will give added low end, and good top end.

    What do you mean by that Denny? I don't understand what you're saying. Do you mean portmatching?

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink