Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 454 Compression ratio -- small cc head or domed piston
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

  1. 12-10-2006 09:03 AM #1
    acechev55
    acechev55 is offline Registered User
    Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    west chicago
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 chevy h.t.
    Posts
    2

    Well my thoughts are the more fuel/air you can get in you cyclinders
    the more H.P. your make. I would go with 110 cc head with the dome pistion if I could afford it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-11-2006 07:04 AM #2
    Grumpy 427's Avatar
    Grumpy 427
    Grumpy 427 is offline CHR Member
    Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Regina canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1977 camaro
    Posts
    65

    Oh sorry. yes i agree the open chamber head will flow way better than a closed chamber head.
    9.65 @ 137 MPH 1.39 60' More left in the car.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-12-2006 06:20 PM #3
    jkferrell
    jkferrell is offline CHR Member
    Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    wheaton
    Posts
    7

    Edelbrock claims the flow on these two heads is exactly the same. They call the chamber a semi-open design.

    Thoughts?

    Jim
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules

Links monetized by VigLink